Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Just finished watching Gran Torino – moving and thoughtful and funny as well. I know… I’m a bit behind on my movie watching (as well as my blogging). If you haven’t seen it, Clint Eastwood directs, produces and also plays “Walt”, a recent widower living in a Michigan suburb now populated by poor Asian immigrants and blighted by gang violence. Through a series of events Walt’s prejudice turns into understanding and compassion for the Asian family who live next door. The family’s home is attacked by a gang and one of the daughters of the house is beaten and raped.

grantorinoposterI found the final main scene amazing. Walt lies on his back on the ground… in the shape of a cross. The camera focuses in on one of his hands and we see blood trickle onto the ground – flowing down his arms from having been shot numerous times in the chest. The way the movie works it seems as if Walt was going to deal with the wrong-doers by simply seeking revenge – the way of eye-for-an-eye justice. But then we are taken by surprise. Instead of revenge, Walt reaches for a lighter in his inside jacket pocket causing the gang members to think he reaching for a gun, and so they shoot him. With many witnesses looking on evil is exposed – brought into full sight, and as a result the gang members are sent to prison.

Walt lying in the form of the cross, with his blood dripping onto the ground, having given his life for his neighbours totally reminded me of Jesus. I’m not quite sure whether that was intended. But it is a very moving scene: Walt, in the same manner as Jesus, giving his life to expose evil and in doing so gaining victory over evil. Often the death of Jesus is thought of in terms of “paying for our sins” in our place, but there is a strong tradition, with a good biblical basis, which portrays Jesus’ death in terms of “victory over the powers” (Christus Victor). I thought Walt’s death was a great illustration of this kind of purposeful sacrificial death. (By the way, we see a similar kind of sacrificial death exposing evil to have victory over evil in the Robert Redford movie “The Last Castle“.)

I should say that there are important differences between Walt’s death and Jesus death. Perhaps the most significant is that Walt is seeking his own salvation in his sacrificial death. He feels he is somehow gaining his own redemption for some of the things he did during the Korean War. Oh… and the other thing is that Walt does not rise from the dead!

Anyways… well worth the watch.

Sorry it’s been so long since my last post. The past couple of weeks have been fairly busy. I was the main speaker at “The Edge” Pioneer Pacific Camp on Thetis Island.

I had to give 7 main talks and 4 smaller talks. My theme was the Kingdom of God which I presented as God’s revolution in the world.

A quick overview…

The coming of Jesus meant the coming of God’s revolution. Like any revolution there is an “Establishment” which is threatened by the revolution. In Jesus’ particular context the Establishment was, generally speaking,  the religious establishment  represented by the Pharisees and the “teachers of the law.” And Jesus gets into all kinds of trouble because he doesn’t obey the laws of the Establishment. The Establishment are those in power who tells us what is important and what is not important (but not in line with who God is and what he values)…. and this allows judgement – these people are sinners and these people are not (so you cannot hang out with them). This allows for a sense of self-justification – for those who follow the rules. But the rules lead to slavery. Jesus comes and blows away these rules with his message of grace and by showing us what God is really like.

Okay… fine. But what does this mean to around one hundred 15-17 year olds from the west coast of Canada? What is the Establishment in their lives which God’s revolution in Jesus challenges? Who tells them what is important and what is not important? Who tells them how and who to judge? Where do they get their sense of justification from?

ParisHiltonWell… I suggested that the Establishment for them was our celebrity-driven consumerist pop culture. And a photo of Paris Hilton was on the video screen as a representative of this Establishment. It is this culture that  tells (or attempts to tell) teenagers what it important and what is  not important, how to judge  – this person is trendy and cool and this person is NOT trendy and cool (so don’t hang out with them). And if you follow the rules of the Establishment you too can feel a sense of self-justification. But ultimately… all this leads to a sense of slavery.

Anyways… that was last week. Today I was kind of taken aback when I read an articles on the BBC website about a girl band who are complaining about not being given air-time on Radio 1. (Full article here)

This should have been a great week for the Dolly Rockers. The “girl band with balls” have just put out their first single, Gold Digger, amidst a flurry of wickedly entertaining TV appearances. But instead of sitting back and watching the cash roll in, the group have called a crisis meeting with their record label.

“Our single didn’t get playlisted on Radio One,” explains 20-year-old Brooke Challinor. “We’re not ashamed to admit it… we’re very nervous.”

It is “crunch time”, admits the band’s blonde Mancunian mouthpiece, and the reason is simple: “It’s because we’re not in the gossip magazines. We’ve made it into the broadsheets because, apparently, we’ve established ourselves as a band with a lot to say. But everything is about celebrity culture now – it doesn’t really matter if you’ve got a valid opinion as long as you’ve got your boobs out.”

Wow…  the Dolly Rockers agree with my take on the establishment!

Their latest single, “Gold Digger” is actually about so-called celebrity culture (the “establishment” of today). Here’s the video with the lyrics below. (Btw, WAG = Wives and Girlfriends of football/soccer players)

 

Or go to the video here.

So there is a WAG in every mag that you all know
Thinks shes got everything but she ain’t got nothing
Well she was real plain, had no brain and had no dough
But now she can roll in it and watch her boobs grow

All the boys will pay whooa ooow
When shes out for prey if theyre straight or gay
She wont end up alone
All the boys stand still Whooa ooow
If looks could kill they probably will

Chorus
Theres a brand new girl thats going round
turning the boys upside down, Gold Digger
Shes an only child thats been away,
now shes back no-ones safe, Gold Digger

Its all very well if you kiss n tell to get ahead
Fit blokes dont count for much unless they got money
They pay for the glitz and the refurb tits
And turned up nose
Maxes their credit card and then its heave ho

All the boys will pay Waoo-o-o
When shes out for prey if theyre straight or gay
She wont end up alone
All the boys stand still Waoo-o-o
If looks could kill they probably will

Chorus
Theres a brand new girl thats going round
turning the boys upside down, Gold Digger
Shes an only child thats been away,
now shes back no-ones safe, Gold Digger

Stick on nails & plastic hair
Gucci bags and Prada shoes
Girl goes clubbing every night
Get a fright when light comes on

Dj …. Gold Digger

In today’s Globe and Mail there was a review article of Francis Ford Coppola, winner of 5 Oscars and Director of classic movies such as The Godfather and Apocalypse Now.

In referred to Copploa’s new movie “Tetro” Michael Posner says the following…

(Coppola is) also interested in the gap that separates artistic and intellectual achievement from human compassion. “I’ve learned that in my life,” he says. “Great genius does not always translate into generosity and bigness of spirit. Picaso, for example. Mean to his kids.” Other examples abound, from Jean-Jaques Rousseau to Bertolt Brecht, from Richard Wagner to Ernest Hemmingway – all, at the human level, monsters of a kind. Culture, he says, cannot save you.

Genius

Just got back from a super quick tour of the North Island of New Zealand, as well as chatting with the fine people at Laidlaw College.

One of my chats was with Dave Wells who teaches courses on youth ministry. Later that day he was teaching and class and sent me a link to video he was going to play at the beginning of the class “ for no reason other than I just found it and I think it is genius.”

I think it’s genius as well!!! It’s by John Bulter.

I’m currently in New Zealand – hence, one of the reasons for my lack of posts.

The weekend before we left Canada Ruth and I (plus our two daughters) “attended” two fairly popular “cultural” events which made me think about the latent need for communal ritual and connection which still resides within our post-Christian culture.

The first event was the Vancouver Folk Festival. This was the less significant of the two events. But nevertheless it was a very “social” gathering that brought together a thousands of people who otherwise wouldn’t have spent much time together. To be honest, we didn’t actually attend the Festival. We just sat on the Jericho beach and enjoyed the sun go down over the Vancouver mountains. From this position just outside the festival perimeter fence we were still able to hear the bands that played – most especially The Proclaimers.

GhostbustersThe second event was the next night. A friend of ours was house-sitting in Yaletown(yuppie downtown Vancouver). She invited us over for a picnic dinner and mentioned that there seemed to be something going on in the park opposite her apartment. So we went downtown and had our picnic in the park. When we arrived there was probably 200-300 there – most of them seated on the ground on picnic blankets of chairs. And there was a huge outdoor cinema screen. It was about 7.15pm and we found out that a movie was going to be shown at 9.30pm. What kind of movie would attracted so many people hours before the start time. Surprisingly it was to be “Ghostbusters“. By 9.25pm there was probably around 1000 people. I couldn’t believe it! What would bring so many people out to watch a 20 year old movie that people could easy watch on their DVD players at home? And what would make people turn up 2 hours before the start? What would bring this diversity of of people – ages, ethnic groups, etc together? Was there some yearning for some kind of communal experience which drew all these people together? A shared emotional experience which is more than the sum of a series of individual experiences?  

Years ago I guess “church” would have meet this need – diverse people coming together to experience something beyond themselves in the context of our shared humanity. But now, instead of going to church done this happens at a public park in downtown Vancouver on a Saturday night while watching “Ghostbuster”! I find this totally amazing!

A few years ago I heard a talk by Ron Reed, Artistic Director of Pacific Theatre, on how movies can feed our souls. And one of the thing I remember his saying was that staying for the credits was like staying for the benediction at the end of a worship service. For many people today going to the movies is like going to church: it a communual/public activity in which the people participating share together an experience that touches their emotions. And the best movies speak to the truth of our human condition and reality and can sometimes even communicate a form of transendence.

At the end of the “service” the credits give us time to reflect and pause on what we have just seen/experienced. It gives us a a pause before we rush back into “normal” everyday life.

From another angle, it also gives us a chance to honour all the people who have helped in putting the movie together. From this point of view, to sit through the credits and acknowledge the names is an act of respect.

Usually there a couple of songs that play during the credits and these songs can play an important role in the experience of “benediction” – often summing up the “feeling” of the movie or sending the people who a specific sense of what has just been experienced.

So… just as no-one at church would thinking about walking out the middle of the benediction, it seems strange to walk out of a movie while the credits are still rolling. It’s not just something tagged on at the end – it’s part of the “whole” experience. But yet, in our consumer driven culture, there is little time for rest and reflection and there is so much peer pressure to leave after the main “consumable” action has been consumed.

Anyways… all of this came to mind at the end of the credits for “Away We Go” (see my previous post). Perhaps only six out of a congregation of 100 stayed for the benediction… but it was well worth holding out.

The music/score was such a key part of the movie. There was a mixture between some classic well known songs (from the likes of George Harrison, The Stranglers, The Velvet Underground and Bob Dylan) and songs from Alexi Murdoch – a London-born, Scottish bred, indie-acoustic musician who has made huge ways with his music but has refused to sign with a majot music label. His music has been used on countless mainstream American TV shows.

Alexi MurdochAs the credits role we were treated to another two “soft warm blanket” Alexi Murdoch tunes. And it was totally benedictory. As I sat there, with all the emotion (laughter and tears) from this movie about this idealistic couple searching for “home” without any real idea of what they were looking for, I heard ”Orange Sky” – a song sung from the perspective of someone returning “home” realizing that their “salvation” lies in receiving the love of the family members who they have somehow turned their backs on – kind of like the Prodigal in the story of the Prodigal son who returns home to experience the embrace of his Father.

The lines of the repeated chorus were particularly poignant and as I heard them I heard the confession of the Christian…

My salvation is in your love.

What an amazing benediction – and all those who had left didn’t get the chance to savour it. As for me, once again I was in tears.

Here’s the song with the full words below. Listen for all the “Prodigal Son” references. Enjoy.

Well I had a dream
I stood beneath an orange sky
Yes I had a dream
I stood beneath an orange sky
With my brother standing by
With my brother standing by
I said brother, you know you know
It’s a long road we’ve been walking on
Brother you know it is, you know it is
Such a long road we’ve been walking on

And I had a dream
I stood beneath an orange sky
With my sister standing by
With my sister standing by
I said sister, here is what I know now
Here is what I know now
Goes like this
In your love, my salvation lies
In your love, my salvation lies
In your love, my salvation lies
In your love, in your love, in your love

But sister you know I’m so weary
And you know sister
My hearts been broken
Sometimes, sometimes
My mind is too strong to carry on
Too strong to carry on

When I am alone
When I’ve thrown off the weight of this crazy stone
When I’ve lost all care for the things I own
That’s when I miss you, that’s when I miss you, that’s when I miss you
You who are my home
You who are my home
And here is what I know now
Here is what I know now
Goes like this
In your love, my salvation lies
In your love, my salvation lies (etc)
In your love, in your love, in your love

Well I had a dream
I stood beneath an orange sky
Yes I had a dream
I stood beneath an orange sky
With my brother and my sister standing by

Away We Go

A week ago Sunday morning I was preaching at church (Point Grey Community Church) and spoke on Jacob coming home 20 years after he has fled from his brother Esau whom he has cheated out of his father’s blessing. Coming home can be hard and scary.

The night before (Saturday) Karis and Alana, our two daughters were on a sleepover, so Ruth and I had the chance to have a date night. So we went to the movies and saw “Away We Go”.

Here’s how I opened my sermon…

“Away We Go a movie about a couple (Burt and Verona) traveling across the US in search of the best place to raise their family. And… on their journey they meet a variety of sad, tragic and embarrassing friends and family.

It’s a movie that has got a lot of mixed reviews, but… I have to say we really liked it. I don’t think I have literally cried so much and laughed so much during one movie. The crying was partly because there was something that resonated in me… watching this idealistic couple journey together through life and wondering where they should call home.

 And in the movie we find that both of Verona’s parents died when she was 22… and this was obviously a huge loss for her. In fact, she refuses to marry Burt, because she will not be able to have her parents at the wedding. We also find that this loss is very hard for her to talk about. And in a conversation with here sister we find that they still haven’t sold their parents home. It’s something in the past that she doesn’t want to face, but… but it obviously affects how she lives in the present.

 And one of the things tjat is really neat about the movie is that… in the end, Burt and Verona decide that they should return to Verona’s parents place and settle there. And so at the end of the movie Verona finds that in order to find a sense of home, she actually has to return home… even though it will be a very painful process and and will mean she will have to deal with grief which she has kept beneath the surface.

 And so as I came away from the movie I thought about Jacob, and his returning home. And an event in his life which means he must face up to the past, and deal, not so much with his hurt and grief, but the hurt and grief that he has caused others through his scheming and manipulating. Returning home for many of us is a difficult thing… but it’s often something we need to do in order to find ourselves and enter into the difficult work of our own growth.”

Ultimately, the “home” that we need to return to is the embrace of God the Father. That is the place that we find ourselves “wandering” to find even though we might not know it. But there is so much that we keep us from returning home. Mainly, I think, the pain it causes us to face up to who we really are, our failures, our sin, our need, our hurts, our inner lostness. And even when we take steps towards home, most of us take these steps tentatively…. unsure… perhaps a bit afraid of what will happen. Like Adam and Eve, most of prefer to remain in hiding than return home.

Please forgive my sins of omission. I haven’t posted in ages.

Last weekend I managed to get 4 tickets on ebay to the Coldplay concert at GM Place here in Vancouver. I paid $215 for 4 tickers (for Ruth, myself and our two daughters) worth over $450… so I thought that was a pretty good deal. I bought them 1pm Saturday… 6 hours before the start of the concert!  Anyways… this is my second Coldplay concert and the second one I have come away from thinking about worship.

Here are some of the things that struck me this time….

Coldplay1In weddings and funerals that I have conducted there has been a trend away from congregational singing (unless it is a “church event”). It’s as if the ritual of singing together as a community in times of either celebration or sadness is fading into the past. However at the concert you had 20,000 people all singing in unison as one “congregation” – individuals not caring who was watching or hearing them sing… complete strangers standing together singing their hearts out with a sense of unity. Sounds kind of like a description of “church worship”. On one side of of us there were some late teen or early twenty-something party girls. On our other side there was a middle-age regular guy there on his own. There were people of all ages (well… mainly under 50) from all kinds of background. It used to be church and Sunday mornings that brought together diverse people. Now its bands like Coldplay.

One of the things that churches are continuing to struggle with at the moment is musical style (part of the so-called “worship wars”). Some church (mainly the bigger ones) have solved the “problem” simply by having separate services with separate styles. Other churches have gone for what they call “blended worship” which often ends up a kind of “middle of the road” non-descript style. (Okay… that might be a bit harsh). At the beginning of the concert, just before they came on, Coldplay set out their (worship) agenda. They played three songs over the PA system (which seemingly they have done at most other concerts on this tour). First… “Magnificent” by U2, then Jay Z’s “I Just Want to Love You (Give it to Me)” and finally, a classical piece, Waldteufal’s “Les Patineurs (The Skater’s Waltz)”. It was an agenda for truly “blended worship” – arena rock, new “urban” music, and classical… and taking the best from each. But yet the agenda was not “in your face”. It was subtle. And from other I spoke to I think I was one of the few who noticed. And it worked. Yes… there was the obvious arena arena rock style. But then part way through the concert they mixed it up with a machine-driven versions of “God Put a Smile Upon Your Face” and the Kraftwerk-sampling “Talk”. And then on at least two occasions Chris Martin gave us some amazing classical piano solos. It seemed to me that this provided a model for church thinking about worship. Creatively using and valuing different styles of music – drawing a variety of people with a variety of musical tastes into a truly shared experienced. Coldplay2

There were also some funnier things to observe…. Like church (at least in years past) people knew when to stand and sit. I so wanted to stand for Snow Patrol (one of the opening acts), but that would somehow have been irreverent. Standing was reserved for what was truly important – Coldplay. And then there was they hand raising! Sometimes I can get a bit frustrated when an over-zealous charismatic worshiper swings their raised hand in front of my face. Well it happened a few times are the concert. That woman in front of me was definitely over-zealous!

One final thought. There were probably more people who saw Coldplay on their two nights in Vancouver (approx. 40,000) then there were people in Church in Vancouver last Sunday.

Okay.. enough words. Here’s a video I took at the concert of the classic Yellow. The quality is not great… but it does provide us with happy memories.

I just watched the final episodes of this season’s 24.

I know that 24 has come in for a lot of criticism for its portrayal of torture (plus its violence etc) and I too would have significant problems with this aspect of the series. Despite this, however, I have to admit to enjoying this kind of edge-of-your-seat action and I think the ethical issues it raises are worth discussing.

24 (2)Also, in watching this series I find significant connections between Jack Bauer’s “sense of call” and his passion “to do whatever it takes” (within certain boundaries) and the call to follow Jesus. When I was a pastor there were more than a few times when I found myself in a difficult situation and wanted simply to run away… but knew that I was called by Jesus to do whatever it took to follow his call and his lead and practice/show the Gospel – which often mean entering into conflict and so as to be able speak/practice truth in love. At these time I often thought of Jack Bauer. Was I willing to take the risks he took – but for the sake of good news of Jesus. Was I willing to bear the cost that he bore – but for the sake of the good news of Jesus? Did I have the courage that Jack Bauer had – but for the sake of the good news of Jesus? Was I as steadfast in my sense as call – but for the sake of the good news of Jesus? Was I (am I?) willing to do whatever it takes to show/practice Christ’s love for the world and for others? 

Anyways, this present series seems to have been a lot more reflective than previous series and asking a lot more questions regarding the justification of torture and violence. (Jack in fact is on trial before a Senate Committee.) And in the final episode series there’s a very moving “death bed scene” in involving Jack. After being infected with a virus it seems as though he has come to the end of his life. And Jack is reflecting on what he has done and how he has lived, and asking whether he had always done the right thing. (His job/calling had cost the life of his wife and had also caused alientation between him and his daughter.)

24 (1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

And in this scene, on the basis of a phone call from Jack, a Muslim cleric comes to visit him. (This man had met Jack a few hours earlier and had been inpressed with his lack of prejudice and his search for truth and justice.)

(Jack) I am dying.

(Cleric) I know.

(Jack) I’ve made so many mistakes, and I always thought that I would have time to crack them.

(Cleric) You have the time right now.

(Jack) You don’t know what I’ve done.

(Cleric) We live in complex times Mr. Bauer. Nothing is black and white. But I do know this. I see before me a man, with all his flaws, and all his goodness. Simply a man. Let us both forgive ourselves for all the wrongs that we have done.

At this point Jack closes his eyes, as if in prayer, and experiences a sense of forgiveness… and thus the peace that will enable him to die well.

It was a moving scene. I was actually in tears (which is not that uncommon). Jack faces up to his own humanity… his limitations… his mistakes. But in doing that there is also the need to experience forgiveness. I loved the fact that the Muslim cleric talked in “we” langauge. Forgiveness is something we all need – no matter how big or small our regrets are.

Over the past weekend I was reminded that most of us want to run from our mistakes. But it is there we can experience the grace and blessing of forgiveness.  This is the place of growth. Yes, in many ways the real challenge, as we look back on our lives, is to forgive ourselves.

Yes… Jesus’ followers can do so because we have first been forgiven by God in Jesus Christ. But it still seems to me that this is an unspoken issue for many of us – dealing with our regrets, limitations, brokeness… and in doing so celebrating our own forgiveness.

Today I attended a “round table discussion” as part of the Regent College Spring School. The panel consisted of

Krish Kandiah, the Executive Director of Churches in Mission of the UK Evangelical Alliance, who is teaching a Spring School course entitled, “Subzero Evangelism: Communicating the Gospel in Post-Christian Contexts.”

Hans Boersma, the JI Packer Professor of Theology at Regent.

Rikk Watts, Professor of New Testament at Regent.

A couple of months ago I attended another debate between Hans and Rikk which centred around their (sometimes opposing) views on philosophy and history. In that debate it was Hans who impressed me and his defence of sacramental ontology. This time is was Rikk who impressed me and his passion for the good news of Jesus. But I think I was really reserving my loudest cheers for what Krish had to say.

There was so much more that could have been said. For example, in “defending” intentional time for doing theological reflection not in a context of mission Rikk cited the example of the Apostle Paul who spent years in Sinai after his conversation. What he failed to mention was that that was in preparation for him to be first and foremost a missionary not a theologian. With Paul we find him doing theology (i.e. writting the books of the New Testament) in the context of mission (i.e. the growth of new church plants).

Anyways… here are some notes that I took of the discussion. The notes are not a “verbatum” recording, but I think most of what is noted was “essentially” said. I’ve grouped the “highlights” under each particular speaker.

So… if you have a read, feel free to let me know what you think.

Hans Boersma

  • Theology is ecclesial engagement… it belongs within the church. It is Christians speaking about the God they really love…. its task is to draw Christians in into the life of the triune God. It is evangelistic in its very nature.
  • Theology has to do with liturgy. The rule of faith comes from the rule of prayer. When I do theology I want to connect this to the liturgy of the church.
  • There is no one method (or model) of evangelism.
  • Modernity cut the link between theology and the church. Thus we have theology with no ecclesial embodiment and no ecclesial authority.
  • Among younger evangelicals… there has been renewed emphasis on the centrality on the church… and talk about monasticism. Perhaps we don’t live as monks enough. New monasticism follows through on writers such as Hauerwas who believe that modernity is incompatible with the Christian faith. The questions we ask need to be shaped by the gospel and not necessarily the questions of modernity.

Rick Watts

  • Mission has to do with participating with God in the “othering”. Life does however have a number of facets. Paul after his conversion goes to Sinai and spends a lot of time in reflection (not mission).
  • We need models, but they are personal. Paul says, imitate me as I imitate Christ.
  • I don’t think the problem is modernity. The problem goes back to the influence of Greek philosophical thought when the discourse of the elite gets co-opted… and you need to know philosophy to do this.
  • Maybe our problem is that we are not comfortable with Jesus. The key question is… how do we form Christ in our lives holistically so that his life flows out in whatever situation we are in?

Krish Kandiah

  • Mission is the total task. Evangelism is a sub-set… the verbal communication of the Gospel.
  • To a certain extent I think there is a divorce…. You can get theological degree without doing evangelism. A key question… is theology learnt in mission? It was only as the early church engaged in mission that they did theology. Thus… can we do theology in the academy through the writing of essays?
  • We need to break down the barriers. In practice there is a division… evangelists don’t tend to think theologically… evangelists don’t think theologians have anything to say… some theologians spend little time in mission. We need to expose theologians to evangelism and expose evangelism to theology.
  • Jesus academy was on the road (in the context of God’s mission in the world). He said… -eat, live and breath with me for 3 years… I’m not going to give you a model… I’m going to ask you to live out my life.
  • Just take a look at commentaries. Most are written with a set of questions about the text, which are not missiological.
  • Jesus model of training was not taking his disciples up a mountain for 3 years to exegete the Old Testament.

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.